The dominance of antagonism during the course of the cold war

Russia over the Ukraine, and the stonewalling of Greece by the Troika might appear to have little in common. Yet both are manifestations of a political-military-financial power play that began during the first Cold War. For President Truman, the Marshall Plan arose partly to guard Greece and other US allies from Communism, but it also had lasting economic implications. The alignment of political leaders and key bankers was more personal back then, but the implications were similar to the present day.

The dominance of antagonism during the course of the cold war

Cold War - Wikipedia

Since that time Ukraine started its own policy, with the Ukrainian point of view on history, international relations, and politics differing greatly from the Russian perspective. The better way to understand the specific features of the Soviet interpretations of the Cold War era — is first of all — to describe some basic facts about the Soviet Union.

Many different political parties and groups were struggling for power in the former Russian empire, but soon the only one remained in the political arena — Bolsheviks later name— Communists.

Since s the government and the political organization of the country were defined by the single party: According to this philosophy, capitalism would be changed into communism. In global politics, this result was a continuation of the class struggle between the regressive capitalists and the progressive working classes.

At the beginning of s it became clear that it would be impossible to spread the revolutionary movement all over the world, especially in those regimes where communists came to power [1]. The idea of world socialist revolution was postponed, but it remain as one of the main ideas of Soviet foreign policy.

Another important note about Soviet policy and politics is connected with internal situation in the Soviet Union. Communists came into power in Russia by force and their domestic policy in first years failed.

While struggling with enemies, less attention was paid to the failed reforms. The leaders of the country considered the USSR as the first socialist state against a blockade of capitalist powers and felt they were in constant danger, fearing a new war was possible and expected.

The Soviet approaches towards historical descriptions of the twentieth century showed that with the emergence of the new type of state — socialist one — it became a target for capitalist aggression.

According to this perspective, all possible conflicts in international relations with the Soviet Union were interpreted as attempts by capitalist powers to suppress the young socialist state. That was a reason why throughout the pre-WWII history the Soviet Union was a certain outsider of international relations.

In his The economic problems of the socialism in the USSRStalin once more underlined that crises and collapse of the world capitalist system is inescapable: After Stalin Khrushchev came into power and soften the Soviet approach towards different issues, especially towards idea of the world socialist revolution.

It was finally moved to the background of primary Soviet interests and was replaced by new idea — competition of two different social-political systems: That is why fight with world bourgeoisie turned into more constructive emulation.

A great number of examples can be found of such contest in sport, culture, science, technologies, medical care, and education and so on. At least within the Soviet Union each development was declared as the unique achievement of the socialist system. The brightest model of attempts to implement that competition was slogan: The idea of competition between two social-political systems played some kind of integration role for the Soviet society: At the same time the idea of peaceful coexistence was reborn, but is was revised as the specific form of class struggle.

The idea of peaceful coexistence remained as the important one, but Brezhnev modified it: Real changes in the Soviet foreign policy occurred only when Gorbachev came into power.

Other Subject Areas

New Thinking for Our Country and the Worldwhich was translated to many foreign languages and published in many countries. The new approach meant first of all the cancellation of the idea of class struggle and was built on the concept of universal values of mankind and the mutual peace interests of different nations, cultures, societies and types of states.

On that political background the idea of peaceful coexistence was once more reborn and the ideas of the world socialist revolution and class struggle were finally given up. We can summarize, that Soviet domestic and foreign policy were defined by combination and piecemeal replacement of few main ideas: Origins of the Cold War: According to the Soviet interpretations the Cold War was provoked by the policy of the USA and other imperialistic countries towards socialist states, first of all towards the USSR [4] Soviet explanations of the background of the Cold war were presented as following: It was first positive move towards realization of the Soviet foreign policy main idea: So those who wanted to change this result of the World War II wanted to destroy the socialist system.

After the World War II the US became a leader in the West, which used its chance to present their own interests as the interests of the whole capitalist world, while other countries were dealing with their economic recovering after the war.

The Soviet state had its own idea to build a socialist world oriented on the benefits of all mankind and especially for the working class all over the Earth, while US was oriented only for their own purposes.Oct 27,  · During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers.

However, the relationship between the two nations HISTORY Vault: The Cold War. The Cold War Consensus was the US foreign policy during the Cold War period.

The dominance of antagonism during the course of the cold war

The three fundamental components include: presidential dominance over congress, the growing foreign and defense policy, and also growing public opinion on anti-communism (McCarthyism).

Post-revisionists" see the events of the Cold War as more nuanced, and attempt to be more balanced in determining what occurred during the Cold War.

The Cold War: Containment

Much of the historiography on the Cold War weaves together two or even all three of these broad categories. Jun 02,  · The Cold War as a System - Michael Cox Many leftists saw the Cold War as a genuine clash between Soviet 'Socialism' and Western capitalism.

Michael Cox, however, shows how Soviet Stalinism and the Cold War helped stabilise global capitalism for 40 years. As soon as the term "Cold War" was popularized to refer to post-war tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, interpreting the course and origins of the conflict has been a source of heated controversy among historians, political scientists, and journalists.

Sowing Crisis NPR coverage of Sowing Crisis: The Cold War and American Dominance in the Middle East by Rashid Khalidi. News, author interviews, critics' .

Cold War Geopolitics | GEOG Geographic Foundations of Geospatial Intelligence